The Comedy
of Consulting
Copyright
2006 by Phillip Good
A
talk given to the San Diego chapter of the ASA
Best
read by narrowing this window
Years
and years and years ago,
When
there were wolves in Wales,
I
was employed full time at Upjohn as a member of the team that developed Motrin
(also known as Ibuprofen or Advil).
What a privilege! The experience
was like…like being a utility infielder for the Yankees. One's role may be small, but sooner or later, one gets to wave a World Series ring in the air.
After
leaving Upjohn, I became a consultant. I haven’t been part of a winning team since.
Mega corporations, medium-sized firms,
start-ups. The experiences may be
different, but one and all, the projects end in disaster.
My first consulting job was for Shiley where
I worked for a woman I’d met while we both completed our post-docs. Characterize the failure rate of our heart
valves, I was asked. “Your devices have
an accelerating failure rate,” I soon warned, “Take precautions.” This was not a message Shiley wanted to
hear, nor did they take precautions. A
few years later, they were bankrupt, and Pfizer bought the shell. Typical, including the buyout. No, I did not get further consulting work
from them.
With a large well-established firm, there is
one and only one reason you are being hired.
The project is a disaster and every knowledgeable employee has already
bailed. I found myself working for the
Bumbling Pharmaceutical and Device Company—that’s the pseudonym I use to
protect the guilty in my book, Manager’s Guide to Design and Conduct of
Clinical Trials. The output of the trials in question had lain undisturbed
for almost three years. That’s because
Bumbling discovered early on that the device was a failure. Of course, the FDA still wanted to see a
write-up, so they had to hire someone—me.
I also got some poor wretch, a newly hired employee to work with
me. Guess what? Most of my job consisted of drawing up lists
and lists of still missing data while the poor wretch’s job was to track the
data down. The job paid the rent.
Right here in San Diego, I once consulted for
a mid-size firm that had also let the forms pile up. This firm is responsible for my adopting an ironclad rule, one
every consultant ought share with prostitutes: Get Paid Up Front. See, the guy who hired me knew going in he’d
screwed up, but the blame was supposed to fall on me, not him. As it was, the job had two sets of
problems—the ones he knew about and the ones he didn’t.
The one he knew about was that the
microcomputer software he’d purchased was inadequate. This was a major problem back in the ‘80’s and ‘90’s. People would try to maintain databases on
microcomputers with 64K of memory, most of which was taken up by the operating
system. They try to do the same thing
today on microcomputers with 256K, most of which is taken up by the operating
system.
Anyhow, the first week or so of the job was
cursed by constant system failures, which somehow were my fault. “I thought you knew how to use this
software?!” In week 3, the FDA liaison
needed a report. I did a double shift
or three only to report the real problem:
“You have 300 patients, but only 75 have follow ups.” Turns out that the President of the company,
an MD, had been making sure that his friends, the other MD’s on the project,
were all getting paid, whether or not their follow-ups had been submitted. Bad idea.
Enough stories. Time for some practical advice. I’ve said it once and now I’ll say it
again: Do what the prosties do, always collect payment in advance. With
too few exceptions, I've had to fight for my money in every consulting project
I've taken on in the past twenty years.
In almost every case, I’ve been hired by someone who has lied about his
own abilities to his superiors or by a team of individuals who’ve built their
working lives around a series of no longer tenable lies.
The man (and he may well have been a woman, I use “he” only for
simplicity) has persuaded his boss that somehow he has the necessary
knowledge to conduct a statistical investigation. To be fair, it is often the pointy-haired boss who, believing
anyone can do research, has said to the employee, you’re it. So I am hired to do programming or data
management. Only as a seeming afterthought do they ask, “You can do a survival
analysis, can’t you?
Xerox was developing a new operating system for its ill-fated line of
computers. Their testing group was
falling behind. Learning I had a
statistical background as well as one in programming, I was asked to do two
things. First, tell us why no matter
how many testers we hire, we never seem to get ahead. Second, tell us when the testing will be complete.
The second question was the easiest.
Each week, the testing group was discovering more and more errors at an
accelerating rate. “Never, the testing
will never be complete” was the answer.
The first question was also easy.
They already knew the answer.
They just wanted me, their consultant, that is, their patsy to be the
one responsible for pointing it out.
Seems the testing group had been given exactly four computers. Whenever a bug was discovered, the offending
computer would sit idle until a member of the programming group could swing by
and do a dump. So mostly, the testers
played cards, gossiped or used the phones.
When we got further and further behind, we were asked to come in
Saturdays. The programming group never
worked on Saturdays, so that really wasn’t much of a plan.
On my next consulting gig, my new supervisor not only lied about the
job, he lied about me. I call this one,
the case of the missing data, also known (to me)as the Christmas Eve massacre:
I met Mike, not his
real name, at a swap meet. I was
selling old software; he was selling old disk drives. Very affable, very outgoing, very high energy, Mike soon learned
all about me. I learned that he was
working for a startup company, was about to become their chief operating
officer. “ And you’ll be our new chief
statistician.” Of course,
there was a catch. Two of them. I’d have to start as a consultant. And
I’d have to wait to get paid till they got the next influx of venture
capital. But in return for waiting, I’d
get a premium over my normal fee.
Rule number two: if it sounds
too good to be true, it probably is
It all sounded good and after a short delay it was all in writing. Mike’s offices were real and the sign on
his door affirmed he was the COO. He
drove a leased luxury car. I was given
my own computer. In no time at all, I
was happily designing trials and analyzing the data Mike gave me. One problem, well, two problems later
on. Mike was giving me summary data
and I wanted to get my hands on the original stuff. “I’m the statistician Mike, you shouldn’t be wasting your time.”
“I’m a statistician, too. You
remember my dissertation.” I did
remember. He was finishing up his
doctorate in clinical psycology and he’d paid me—very little--to do the
statistics.
The second problem arose the week before Christmas. I learned Mike’s company had got their
venture capital, had had it for a couple of weeks, only I hadn’t been
paid. I rushed to Mike’s office. Mike’s
boss was there too along with several miscellaneous flunkies. I didn’t have a chance to discuss money. Mike’s boss wanted the analysis, wanted it
now. Mike looked at me. “I need the raw data,” I said, “ I also need
my mon…”
“Give him the data,” Mike’s boss interrupted. He didn’t use my name; I wondered if he knew it?
It took a weekend to wrest the data from Mike. Half a dozen trips to his house—I was given the wrong files
twice—endless waits, plus arguments with Mike’s boss over the delays and over
my insistence that I be paid just for waiting.
O.K., Mike’s boss wanted results.
Frankly, so did I.
It was late on a Saturday night when I was finally given the correct
files. Sunday morning, I got to employ
that most invaluable of SAS procedures, PROC MEANS, which among its other
features displays data ranges. On Monday I was able to ask one of the
technicians whether zero was a legitimate reading. It wasn’t, yet more than half the readings consisted of
zeros. Moreover, at least a dozen of
the records in the database were near duplicates, similar names, slightly
different addresses and birth dates, but otherwise identical. Conclusion: The data had been faked.
I’d no choice but to bring the news to Mike’s boss. But first things first, “I need to get
paid.” Mike’s boss looked at me the way
you or I might consider some creature that has just crawled out from between
the floorboards. “I can you pay now,”
he said, “But if I have to, if you force me to, you’ll never work for me
again.”
“I’ll take the money.” The
check was for half the amount due and was written against some obscure
one-branch bank an hour’s drive away. I
drove to the bank, cashed the check and had the money in my hands within the
hour. No “Chief Statistician” job for
me.
Two months later, I heard from Milton, Mike’s boss (we were on a first
name basis now). Mike’s behavior had
grown increasingly bizarre and eventually he’d had to be hospitalized.
(Methamphetamine does that to you).
Milton had hired a second statistician, finally, and verified that the
data was faked. “I just thought you
were another of Mike’s crazy friends, I didn’t take you seriously.” He offered me another consulting
job. I passed.
But maybe you still
believe in the Easter Bunny, assume my problems (all of them) are unique to me
and stem from working for under-capitalized startups like Xerox and
Guidant. Not true. Think about why companies call on a
consultant’s services in the first place. (I know they told you they had
a hiring freeze, but they lied.)
1. The project is
doomed. (In the corporate world a
project is doomed once higher management abandons it. Abandonment may be for
any of a myriad reasons, some related to the project and some not: Interim analysis reveals a new treatment to
be ineffectual, but the FDA requires a final summary and analysis anyway. Or a new executive broom, busy downsizing,
declares his predecessor's pet project redundant. Let a consultant do it.)
2. The project is
flawed and someone must be blamed. (Don't expect them to thank you when
you tell them, correctly, that they ought to have called in a statistician
during the design phase.)
3. They’re hoping for
a miracle. ("The last statistician didn't think anything could be done
either, but since your rates were so much higher....")
It doesn’t take long to
realize that your client’s problems stem from failures in data collection and
data management, to say nothing of their frequent practice of making the decision first,
then gathering the supporting data afterward. Such
problems are readily avoidable, but, surprisingly, clients never express
interest in how similar problems might
be prevented, nor, the consultant soon learns, are you being paid to tell them.
Don’t expect praise for your efforts and,
even with a written contract, expect to have to fight for your final week’s
pay.
Here are some preventive measures for you: Get paid up front. Offer
a discount for advance payment, if necessary.
If the project is long-term (that is, longer than the client is willing
to pay for up front) get a written contract.
Maintain a regular line of communication with the person who authorizes
payment (not infrequently, you’ll speak with this person only once and then be
shunted off to subordinates.)
Cover your ass.
Communicate. Tell the client
what you feel should be done and how long you expect it to take. Bill for the initial consultation and begin
work on the principal project only after you’ve received written
authorization to start the work (an
email will do). Break the work into
parts, obtain written authorization prior to starting each part, and bill as
you go.
Follow up on your
collections. Money for external
consultants often falls in some accounting never land; it’s not that they don’t
intend to pay you, it’s just that with some critical person on vacation or
maternity leave, they don’t know what account to pay you from.
As noted at the start of my talk, I was far more successful and happy as
an Internal consultant. What did I do
at Upjohn that helped me to suceed? I
read the journals and internal memos in the fields I was supporting—gi,
immunology, cns, cardiology. I joined their
journal clubs. I even volunteered as a
lab assistant when people were out sick or on maternity leave. I know how to kill mice in at least four
differ ways.
So, Last, but by no means, least:
Learn to speak the language your
client's use. Don't ask what
“significance level” or “power” they want to use. They won't know the meaning of the terms and are unlikely to have
answers should you try to explain them.
Need values? Learn your client's
language, then glean the needed values from their literature.